William B. Crawley, Appellant, v. B. Norris Vassar, Frank E. Saunders, Morris L. Ridley, Lewisw. Hurst, George M. Hampton, Appellees, 810 F.2d 194 (4th Cir. 1987)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 810 F.2d 194 (4th Cir. 1987) Submitted March 20, 1986. Decided Jan. 14, 1987

Before WIDENER, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

William B. Crawley, appellant pro se.

Michael A. Likavec, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:


A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no meritorious ground on appeal of its order dismissing for want of exhaustion appellant's challenge to the denial of parole. Because the dispositive issues have recently been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Crawley v. Vassar, C/A No. 85-549-N (E.D. Va., Nov. 1, 1985).

DISMISSED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.