Jeffrey Nathan Little, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Dan T. Mahon, Defendant-appellee, 804 F.2d 677 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseJeffrey Nathan Little, appellant pro se.
Robert Harkness Herring, Office of the Attorney General, for appellee.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, WIDENER and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the magistrate. Little v. Mahon, C/A No. 86-160-R (E.D. Va., May 29, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
