Van Prince Welch, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Rae H. Mcnamara; Hazel Keith, Defendants-appellees, 802 F.2d 452 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseVan Prince Welch, appellant pro se.
Jacob L. Safron, Office of the Attorney General, for appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, HALL and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opin ion adopting the magistrate's recommendation discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and af firm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Welch v. McNamara, C/A No. 84-1063-CRT (E.D.N.C., May 2, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
