Ricky Tarpley, Appellant, v. Marshall Concrete Products of Danville, Inc., Formerly Knownas Danville Concrete Products Company,incorporated, Appellee, 798 F.2d 1409 (4th Cir. 1986)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 798 F.2d 1409 (4th Cir. 1986) Submitted June 23, 1986. Decided Aug. 14, 1986

Ricky Tarpley, appellant pro se.

Stuart L. Craig, Carter, Craig & Bass, P.C., for appellee.

W.D. Va.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Before PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Ricky Tarpley, pro se, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment for the defendant in this suit filed under 42 U.S.C. 55 2000e, et seq. Before granting summary judgment against a pro se litigant, the district court must afford that litigant an opportunity to respond to the opposing party's allegations, and notice that failure to respond might result in the entry of summary judgment against him. Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975). Because the district court failed to comply with these requirements, we vacate the judgment and remand with instructions to the court to give Tarpley such an opportunity and notice. Because the dispositive issue recently has been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.