Trinity Ambulance Service, Inc., Aetna Ambulance Service,inc., Plaintiffs- Appellants, v. G & L Ambulance Services, Inc., City of Hartford, and L & Mambulance Corp., Defendants-appellees, 787 F.2d 86 (2d Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseEliot B. Gerstein, Hartford, Conn. (Allan W. Koerner, Gersten & Gersten, Hartford, Conn., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant Trinity Ambulance Service, Inc.
Sidney T. Schulman, Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff-appellant Aetna Ambulance Service, Inc.
Anthony J. Palermino, Hartford, Conn., for defendant-appellee L & M Ambulance Corp.
Martin S. Stillman, Rocky Hill, Conn., for defendant-appellee Professional Ambulance Service, Inc.
James A. Wade, Hartford, Conn. (Janet C. Hall, Theodore J. Tucci, Robinson & Cole, Hartford, Conn., of counsel), for defendant-appellee City of Hartford.
Arthur A. Palmunen, Hartford, Conn., for defendant-appellee G & L Ambulance Services, Inc.
Before OAKES, WINTER and PRATT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Assuming arguendo that the contracts entered into by the City of Hartford would have violated the antitrust laws but for the "state action" exemption, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Cabranes in his opinion, 625 F. Supp. 142 (D. Conn. 1985).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
