Unpublished Dispositionfrancis E. Evans, Petitioner-appellant, v. Arthur Tate, Jr., Supt., Respondent-appellee, 774 F.2d 1162 (6th Cir. 1985)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 774 F.2d 1162 (6th Cir. 1985) 9/26/85

S.D. Ohio

APPEAL DISMISSED

ORDER

BEFORE: KEITH, KENNEDY and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.


This matter is before the Court upon consideration of appellant's motion for appointment of counsel, and the appeal has been referred to this panel pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. This Court on June 11, 1985 entered an order directing appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has failed to respond to the show cause order.

It appears from the record that judgment was entered on December 19, 1984 and the notice of appeal was filed on January 18, 1985, three days late. Rules 4(a) and 26(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The failure of an appellant to file a notice of appeal within the prescribed time period deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Rule 4(a) is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this Court can neither waive nor extend. Peake v. First Nat. Bank and Trust Co. of Marquette, 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1983). Rule 26(b) specifically provides that this Court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal.

It is ORDERED that the appeal be and it hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(d) (1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.