Unpublished Dispositionwilliam J. Bogard, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee, 772 F.2d 905 (6th Cir. 1985)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 772 F.2d 905 (6th Cir. 1985) 8/2/85

W.D. Ky.

AFFIRMED

ORDER

BEFORE: ENGEL, JONES and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges.


This matter is before the Court upon consideration of appellant's motion for appointment of counsel.

It appears from the file that the final order was entered February 11, 1985. The notice of appeal filed on June 3, 1985 was 52 days late. Rule 4(a) and 26(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The failure of an appellant to timely file a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Rule 4(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this Court can neither waive nor extend. Peake v. First Nat. Bank and Trust Co. of Marquette, 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1983). Rule 26(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, specifically provides that this Court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal.

It is ORDERED that the appeal be and it hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(d) (1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

It is further ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be and hereby is denied.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.