Unpublished Dispositioneugene Wright, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. J. Estes Cocke, Attorney, Defendant-appellee, 765 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1985)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 765 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1985) 5/13/85

ORDER

BEFORE: JONES and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges; and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.


Plaintiff appeals the district court's order dismissing his pro se civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has moved for appointment of counsel on appeal. The case has been referred to a panel of this Court pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 9(a). Upon examination of the record, the panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that his court-appointed attorney failed to file an appeal in his habeas corpus action. The district court correctly held that a court-appointed attorney does not act under color of state law within the meaning of section 1983. See Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312 (1981).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel is denied and the district court's judgment is affirmed. Sixth Circuit Rule 9(d) (2).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.