Freddie Joe Simmons, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, a Corporation,defendant-appellee, 611 F.2d 342 (10th Cir. 1979)
Annotate this CaseLyle McPheeters, Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff-appellant.
Robert D. Allen and Thomas J. Enis, of Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendant-appellee.
Before BARRETT, DOYLE and McKAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was employed by the defendant. He brought an action on a variety of theories, claiming that the defendant monitored and disclosed the contents of conversations appellant engaged in while working as a testboardman, a receiver of customer trouble reports. The trial court granted summary judgment against plaintiff on all issues. The facts and the trial court's reasons for its disposition are thoroughly set forth in the trial court's opinion reported at 452 F. Supp. 392 (W.D.Okl.1978).
We affirm for the reasons given by the trial court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
