The Tomkins-johnson Company, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent, 570 F.2d 150 (6th Cir. 1978)
Annotate this CaseJohn S. Greenebaum, John S. Keck, Barnett & Alagia, Louisville, Ky., for appellant.
Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Bernard Gottfried, Director, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., for appellee.
Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This cause was submitted to this Court on the briefs of counsel. The Court, having considered the briefs and studied the record, and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the finding that Petitioner violated § 8(a) (1) and § 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act by coercively interrogating and suspending and discharging certain employees. The Court is further of the opinion that the Administrative Law Judge drew no improper inferences from the record and did not err in excluding from his consideration certain evidence.
It is hereby ORDERED that the petition for review is denied and the cross-petition for enforcement of the National Labor Relations Board order is granted.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
