National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Stockton Door Co., Inc., Respondent, 547 F.2d 489 (9th Cir. 1976)
Annotate this CaseAileen Armstrong, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
James B. Atkinson, Stockton, Cal., for respondent.
Before ELY and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The petitioning Board, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 160(e), has applied for enforcement of its order issued against the Respondent. The Board's Decision and Order is reported at 218 NLRB No. 156.
Reviewing the record as a whole, we find substantial evidence supporting the Board's finding that the Respondent violated section 8(a) (1), (2), (3), and (5) of the Act. The violations by Respondent were (1) its withdrawal of its recognition of the Carpenters Union and refusal to bargain with that Union, (2) its unilateral change of the terms and conditions of employment, and (3) its recognizing and entering into a collective bargaining agreement with the Teamsters Union when the Teamsters did not represent a majority of the Respondent's employees.
ENFORCED.
Honorable William H. Orrick, Jr., United States District Judge, San Francisco, California, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
