David Stirling, Jr., and William G. Stirling, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Chemical Bank, Individually, and As Agent, et al.,defendants-appellees, 516 F.2d 1396 (2d Cir. 1975)
Annotate this CaseFeldshuh, Weinberger & Derfner, New York City (Sidney Feldshuh, Donald A. Derfner, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City (Ralph L. McAfee, Richard S. Simmons, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees Chemical Bank, Frank Beatty, John J. Irish and Paavo Prima.
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, New York City, for defendant-appellee The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blaine & Huber, Buffalo, Bleakley, Platt, Schmidt, Hart & Fritz, New York City, for defendants-appellees Marine Midland Bank Western and Marine Midland Bank Rochester.
Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle, Rochester, N. Y., Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City, for defendant-appellee Lincoln First Bank of Rochester.
Debevoise, Plimpton, Lyons & Gates, New York City, for defendant-appellee Union Commerce Bank.
Before CLARK, Associate Justice,* and HAYS and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm upon Judge Bonsal's well considered opinion reported at 382 F. Supp. 1146 (S.D.N.Y. 1974).
United States Supreme Court, retired, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
