National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Motor City Electric Company, Respondent, 512 F.2d 719 (6th Cir. 1975)
Annotate this CaseElliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Peter G. Nash, John S. Irving, Patrick H. Hardin, John D. Burgoyne, William M. Bernstein, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Bernard Gottfried, Director, Region 7, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., for petitioner.
Allen Schwartz, Leonard D. Givens, Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, Thomas P. Hustoles, Detroit, Mich., for respondent.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge, and RUBIN, District Judge.*
ORDER
This case is before the court on the application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order issued against Motor City Electric Company on June 25, 1973. Reference is made to the decision of the Board, reported at 204 N.L.R.B. No. 77, for a recitation of the facts.
Among other things the Board ordered the company to offer immediate reemployment to Robert D. McDaniel. Upon consideration, the court concludes that this part of the order of the Board is not supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S. Ct. 456, 95 L. Ed. 456 (1951).
The court concludes that the remaining parts of the order of the Board are supported by substantial evidence.
Accordingly, it is ordered that enforcement is granted as to all parts of the order and decision of the Board except that part requiring the reemployment of Robert D. McDaniel.
Honorable Carl B. Rubin, Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
