Michael S. Ross, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the United States Attorney's Office for the Central Districtof California Including Messrs. Robert C. Bonner and Michaelsulner, Assistant and Deputy Attorney, Criminal Complaints,defendant-appellee, 511 F.2d 524 (9th Cir. 1975)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 511 F.2d 524 (9th Cir. 1975)

Feb. 20, 1975


Michael S. Ross, in pro. per.

Clarke A. Knicely, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before KOELSCH and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and RENFREW,*  District judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


The well-settled principle that mandamus does not lie to compel a United States District Attorney to perform a discretionary act (Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller, 477 F.2d 375 (2nd Cir. 1973)) is dispositive of this appeal.

Affirmed.

 *

The Honorable Charles B. Renfrew, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation