Vicente Ruiz-salazar and Juanita Almanza De Ruiz, Petitioners, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent, 505 F.2d 118 (5th Cir. 1974)
Annotate this CaseJoseph J. Rey, Jr., El Paso, Tex., for petitioners.
William B. Saxbe, Atty. Gen., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Frank D. McCown, U.S.Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., Rex Young, Atty., John L. Murphy, Gov. Regulations Sec. Crim. Div., Washington, D.C., District Director, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Immig. & Naturalization, Dallas, Tex., Troy A. Adams, Jr., Dist. Dir., Immig. & Nat., New Orleans, La., for respondent.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and AINSWORTH and DYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
On the authority of Gonzalez de Moreno v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service,1 5 Cir., 1974, 492 F.2d 532, Section 241(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1251(f) is applicable to aliens who fraudulently or through misrepresentation obtain visas, documentation, or entry into the United States. Consequently, this case is controlled by Gonzalez, supra, and its progeny. Cortez-Flores v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 5 Cir., 1974, 500 F.2d 178; Castro-Guerrero v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 5 Cir., 1974, 503 F.2d 964 (1974).
Reversed.
Citing the Supreme Court case of Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Errico, 1966, 385 U.S. 214, 217, 87 S. Ct. 473, 476, 17 L. Ed. 2d 318
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
