United States of America, Appellee, v. William Rovendro and Christopher Espinosa, Appellants, 502 F.2d 1153 (2d Cir. 1974)
Annotate this CaseMartin Light, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Stanley M. Meyer, Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel), for appellants.
Joan S. O'Brien, Asst. U.S. Atty. (David G. Trager, U.S. Atty. for the E.D. of New York, Paul B. Bergman, Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel), for appellee.
Before OAKES, Circuit Judge, and FRANKEL and KELLEHER, District judges.1
PER CURIAM:
Appellants' sole ground for appeal before this court is that they should have been allowed to withdraw their guilty pleas. Having examined the relevant transcripts and contentions addressed thereto, we are of the opinion that the judgments must be affirmed.
Judgments affirmed.
Of the Southern District of New York and the Central District of California, respectively, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
