United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Harman Victor Usher, Defendant-appellant.no. 73-4022 Summary Calendar.**rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N.y. 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970), 500 F.2d 388 (5th Cir. 1974)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - 500 F.2d 388 (5th Cir. 1974) Sept. 9, 1974, Rehearing Denied Oct. 10, 1974

Edward C. Stone, Atlanta, Ga. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

William Schloth, U.S. Atty., Macon, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GEWIN, GODBOLD and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Pursuant to this court's remand under United States v. Dover, 489 F.2d 688 (5th Cir. 1974), the district judge who sentenced the defendant has supplemented the record in this cause with the statement 'At the time I pronounced sentence in this case I determined and I now determine that the Defendant would not derive benefit from treatment under 18 U.S.C. 5010(b) (The Youth Correction Act).' This statement complies with the district court's duty under that act. Dorszynski v. United States, U.S., 94 S. Ct. 3042, 41 L. Ed. 2d (1974).

Since Usher has never raised with the district court any question as to the propriety of his waiver of the right to be represented by counsel in that forum, we refuse to consider his contention to that effect on this appeal.

The judgment and commitment entered March 14, 1973 and the subsequent actions of the district court in this cause are

Affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.