Fotomat Corporation, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent, 497 F.2d 901 (6th Cir. 1974)
Annotate this CaseJoseph M. Day, Louisville, Ky., for petitioner; D. Paul Alagia, Jr., Brown, Alagia, Miller & Senn, Louisville, Ky., on brief.
Joseph E. Mayer, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Warren Ogden, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief.
Before EDWARDS, CELEBREZZE and McCREE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, reported at 207 N.L.R.B. No. 65 (1973). The Board found coercive interrogation of employees who were seeking to organize a union, in violation of 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. 158(a) (1) (1970), and violations by discriminatory discharges of Brenda Meyers and Jewell Newton, in violation of 8(a) (3) and (1) of the Act.
Petitioner seeks review only as to the order requiring reemployment of Jewell Newton.
On review of the total record; and Finding substantial evidence on same to support the findings and conclusions of the National Labor Relations Board,
Enforcement of the order of the Board is granted.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
