Herbert D. Wiener and Shirley M. Wiener, Petitioners-appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee.george M. Wiener and Barbara E. Wiener, Petitioners-appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee, 494 F.2d 691 (9th Cir. 1974)
Annotate this CaseSidney J. Machtinger (argued), Greenberg & Glusker, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners-appellants.
Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued), Meyer Rothwacks, Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Lee H. Henkel, Jr., Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee.
Before DUNIWAY and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and POWELL,1 District judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
These are appeals from a decision of the Tax Court which is reported at 58 T.C. 81 (1972). The question presented is one of mixed fact and law. Our examination of the record convinces us that the Tax Court's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, and that its legal conclusions are correct.
Affirmed.
The Honorable Charles L. Powell, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
