Ottis Mayo Jones, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Gertrude Bales et al., Defendants-appellees, 480 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1973)
Annotate this CaseOttis Mayo Jones, pro se.
Gertrude Bales, pro se.
Louis C. Woolf, Knoxville, Tenn., and John E. Dougherty, Atlanta, Ga., for Cheatham and Waggoner.
John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., and Beverly B. Bates, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for Kirksey and Taylor.
Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the reasons stated and authorities cited in the final order, Jones v. Bales, N.D. Ga. 1972, 58 F.R.D. 453.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
