In the Matter of Clyde R. James, Bankrupt.in the Matter of Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt.james H. Riggs, Trustee and Appellant, v. Clyde R. James, Bankrupt and Appellee.edward M. Walsh, Trustee and Appellant, v. Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt and Appellee, 470 F.2d 996 (9th Cir. 1972)
Annotate this CaseBurton I. Meyer (argued), of Glicksberg, Kushner & Goldberg, Harvey W. Hoffman, San Francisco, Cal., Robert R. Barton, Oakland, Cal., for appellants.
Thomas R. Adams (argued), Peter H. Reid, Ralph L. Jacobson, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County, Daly City, Cal., Hansen, Jaffe & Weiss, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Lynn Anderson Koller, (argued), of Newmark & Koller, Lafayette, Cal., for amicus curiae.
Before BARNES, KOELSCH and ELY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The challenged Orders of the District Court are affirmed upon the authority of Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18, 91 S. Ct. 113, 27 L. Ed. 2d 124 (1970), and the carefully reasoned opinion of District Judge Wollenberg. In re Cedor, 337 F. Supp. 1103 (D.C.N.D. Cal. 1972).
We cannot see that our opinion in any way conflicts with In re Aveni, 458 F.2d 972 (6th Cir. 1972). There, a clearly different problem was presented.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
