Eddie Javor, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee, 467 F.2d 481 (9th Cir. 1972)
Annotate this CaseRichmond G. Sherman (argued), Beverly Hills, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.
David P. Curnow, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U. S. Atty., William D. Keller, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent-appellee.
Before ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and ENRIGHT, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
Petitioner appeals the denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He contended that his retained attorney was incompetent, and that he had been denied the effective assistance of counsel at his trial.
The critical factual determination on the competence of counsel was made after a comprehensive hearing in which the district court gave careful consideration to every point urged by petitioner. The findings against the petitioner are supported by substantial evidence.
Affirmed.
The Honorable William B. Enright, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
