Walton W. Mims, Individually and As a Representative of Aclass of Citizens Composed of Residents Andtaxpayers of a Common Geographicalsubdivision, Appellants, v. W. G. Yarborough et al., Appellees, 461 F.2d 1266 (4th Cir. 1972)
Annotate this CaseStanley H. Kohn, Columbia, S. C. (Gerald M. Finkel and Kohn & Finkel, Columbia, S. C., on brief), for appellants.
J. Kendall Few and Howard L. Burns, Greenwood, S. C., for appellees.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and FIELD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
For the reasons stated by the District Judge, we find no inconsistency between the plans for this water distribution system and the requirements of the federal statutes under which loans and grants have been authorized to finance its construction. Mims v. Yarborough, D.S.C., 343 F. Supp. 1146.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
