United States of America v. Francis X. Morin, Jr., et al. Appeal of Albert Lamolinare, 458 F.2d 990 (3d Cir. 1972)
Annotate this CaseJohn W. Ford, McArdle & Mansmann, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.
Richard L. Thornburgh, U. S. Atty., Blair A. Griffith, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.
Before BIGGS, VAN DUSEN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
The alleged objectionable statements in the jury instructions asserted for the first time in this court could have been easily remedied by the Trial Judge by simple curative language. Instead of raising these objections voiced in the district court, counsel for appellant expressed himself as "satisfied" with the charge. We can perceive no basis for sustaining the appeal on this issue.
United States v. Chicarelli, 445 F.2d 1111 (3 Cir. 1971).
There is sufficient evidence from which the jury could have inferred that the appellant was an aider and abettor in the Pittsburgh National Bank robbery. 18 U.S.C. § 2. This ground also is ineffectual. United States v. Bradley, 447 F.2d 657, 659-660 (3 Cir. 1971).
We perceive no reversible error in this record. The judgment of conviction will be affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
