Laszlo Habda, Appellant, v. Jack Wysocker, Esq, 458 F.2d 537 (3d Cir. 1972)
Annotate this CaseLaszlo Habda, in pro. per.
Ralph De Sevo, De Sevo, Cerutti, Lombadi & Fitzpatrick, Jersey City, N. J., for appellee.
Before HASTIE and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges, and BECKER, District Judge.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
Appellant's civil action for damages against his former attorney alleges that the attorney in a criminal case in a state court neglected to challenge the legal sufficiency of an indictment. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant on the ground that there was no federal jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1343. On the authority of Thomas v. Howard, 455 F.2d 228 (3d Cir., filed Feb. 9, 1972), we affirm.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
