In the Matter of G. Douglas and Mary Tibbitts, Bankrupt, Appellants, v. James E. Cussen, Trustee, et al., Appellees, 456 F.2d 1314 (9th Cir. 1972)
Annotate this CaseDavid J. Langum (argued), of Christenson, Hedemark & Langum, San Jose, Cal., Loren Dahl, Sacramento, Cal., for appellants.
Joseph S. Genshlea, (argued), of Downey, Brand, Seymour & Rohwer, Thomas W. Olson, Jr., Cloyd T. Clowdus, Bryte M. Peterson, Ref. in Bankruptcy, Sacramento, Cal., for appellees.
Before CHAMBERS and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and MURRAY,** District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
On this appeal from two bankruptcy orders, we affirm.
We conclude that the finding of unfeasibility of an arrangement plan was not clearly erroneous.
The objection as to adequate notice to the bankrupts and creditors was not raised below. It is not a case of no notice. Thus, we do not think it presents here a naked question of power to act.
Honorable W. D. Murray, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
