Donald Doxzen, Appellant, v. Director of Patuxent Institution, Appellee, 448 F.2d 786 (4th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseDecided October 19, 1971
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; R. Dorsey Watkins, Judge.
Richard L. Bazelon, Philadelphia, Pa. (Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish, Levy & Coleman, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
Alfred J. O'Ferrall, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Maryland (Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen., of Maryland, on the brief), for appellee.
Before BOREMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and CRAVEN and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal, assailing the constitutional validity of procedure under Article 31B, §§ 5 and 7(a), Annotated Code of Maryland, raises issues similar to those disposed of in Sas v. State of Maryland (CA 4, 1964) 334 F.2d 506, and Tippett v. State of Maryland (CA 4, 1971) 436 F.2d 1153. On the authority of those decisions, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
