United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Charles Robert Muncaster, Defendant-appellant, 447 F.2d 1367 (5th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseOpinion of Panel August 20, 1971
Rehearing Denied September 21, 1971
Appeal from the United States Disstrict Court for the Middle District of Alabama; Frank M. Johnson, Jr., Chief Judge.
Jerome Daly, Savage, Minn., of counsel for defendant-appellant.
Ira deMent, U. S. Atty., David B. Byrne, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.
ON SUGGESTION FOR HEARING EN BANC
Before WISDOM,** COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
No Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on hearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Hearing En Banc is denied.
OPINION OF PANEL
Before WISDOM,*** COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Robert Muncaster was convicted [Counts I and II of the indictment, returned September 12, 1969] of failing and neglecting from January 17, 1967 to January 22, 1967, to register under the Military Selective Service Act of 1967, 50 App.U.S.C. 462.
This conviction is affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
Muncaster was likewise convicted [Counts III and IV] of a similar offense between January 17, 1967 and September 12, 1969. This conviction is reversed, Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112, 90 S. Ct. 858, 25 L. Ed. 2d 156 (1970).
The indefinite sentence imposed under the Youth Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C., § 5010(b) remains undisturbed.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
Judge Wisdom did not participate in the entry of the foregoing order, the same being done by a quorum of the Court, 28 U.S.C., § 46(d)
Judge Wisdom participated in the decision placing this case on the Summary Calendar and in the disposition as above set forth. He did not participate in the rendition of this original opinion, see 28 U.S.C., § 46(d)
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
