National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Sir James, Inc., Respondent, 446 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseThomas Silfen (argued), NLRB, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
David S. Bradshaw (argued), Don T. Hibner, of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The Board's order will be enforced.
The early unilateral discontinuance of the health and welfare payments we conclude was an unfair labor practice. Hinson v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 428 F.2d 133.
The finding that the company refused to bargain to an impasse is supported by the record considered as a whole.
THOMPSON, District Judge, dissents on the refusal to bargain issue.
Bruce R. Thompson, judge of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
