United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Arthur Alex Sirmans, Defendant-appellant.no. 71-1025 Summary Calendar.**rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 431 F.2d 409, Parti (5th Cir. 1970), 444 F.2d 119 (5th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseLarry Bodiford, Panama City Fla., (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.
William Stafford, U.S. Atty., Clinton Ashmore, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tallahassee, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida; David L. Middlebrooks, Jr., District Judge.
Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970)
The appellant contends that the guilty verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence and that there is no sufficient substantial evidence to support the verdict.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
