B-e-c-k Mclaughlin & Associates, Petitioner and Appellee, v. the Renegotiation Board, Appellant, 443 F.2d 1180 (9th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- 443 F.2d 1180 (9th Cir. 1971)
July 7, 1971
On Petition to Review a Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.
James H. Prentice (argued), Special Litigation Atty., L. Patrick Gray, III, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Simon Wampold (argued), Josef Diamond, Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and VON DER HEYDT, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
We are unable to find either errors of law by the Tax Court or that the findings of fact are arbitrary or capricious.
The case is affirmed on the opinion of the Tax Court, TC Memo 1969-15; see ¶ 69,015 P-H Memo TC.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
