United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Jack Daniel Nadeau, Defendant-appellant, 442 F.2d 362 (9th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Robert F. Peckham, Judge.
John E. Thorne, of Thorne, Stanton, Clopton, Herz & Stanek, San Jose, Cal., for appellant.
James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., Jerrold M. Ladar, Chief, Crim. Div., James L. Hazard, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
Appellant's contention that his conscientious objector claim should have been considered by his local board is disposed of by Ehlert v. United States, 401 U.S. ___, 91 S. Ct. 1319, 28 L. Ed. 2d 625 (1971).
His contention that the local board was improperly constituted is disposed of by United States v. Nix, 437 F.2d 746 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Wallace, 435 F.2d 12, 14-15 (9th Cir. 1970).
Judgment affirmed.
Honorable William J. Jameson, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
