Reinhold Wengler, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Dennis B. Harter, Defendant-appellee, 439 F.2d 1199 (9th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii; Martin Pence, Judge.
Richard D. Welsh (argued), David N. Ingman, Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellant.
James E. T. Koshiba (argued), Bert T. Kobayashi, Jr., George R. Ariyoshi, Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellee.
Before KOELSCH, CARTER and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant contends that there was error in the refusal of the trial judge to instruct on the doctrine of the last clear chance. The state of the evidence in the case did not require the giving of the instruction.
Judgment affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
