United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Walter R. Grooms, Defendant-appellant, 438 F.2d 967 (6th Cir. 1970)
Annotate this CaseDale Quillen, Nashville, Tenn., on brief, for defendant-appellant.
W. Thomas Dillard, Asst. U.S. Atty., Knoxville, Tenn., for plaintiff-appellee; John L. Bowers, Jr., U.S. Atty., Knoxville, Tenn., on brief.
Before McCREE and BROOKS, Circuit Judges, and O'SULLIVAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Following a jury trial the defendant-appellant appeals his conviction for conspiring to violate and violating the Internal Revenue Laws. D.C., 320 F. Supp. 498. (Title 18 U.S.C. 371 and Title 26 U.S.C. 5604(a) (1)). He complains (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction; (2) of the denial of permission to examine the court reporter's notes of another case; (3) of failure to grant him severance; and (4) of the unconstitutionality of the Internal Revenue Laws. We have considered all of these issues and conclude they are without merit and that defendant was afforded a fair trial free of any prejudicial error. Certiorari Denied, 400 U.S. 929, 91 S. Ct. 189, 27 L. Ed. 2d 190.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
