United States of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. James Gilbert Hays, Appellant, 438 F.2d 538 (9th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; William T. Beeks, Judge.
Philip Mahoney (argued), Seattle, Wash., for appellant.
Chas. Pinnell, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Stan Pitkin, U. S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, BROWNING and CARTER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is affirmed. We have not considered on the merits the point of the denial of the motion for new trial. At the time it was before the district court, that court had no jurisdiction to consider it. (The case was never remanded.) We assume the motion or another one may be regularly considered now.
Other points raised we have considered and find without merit.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
