United States of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Paul Dall Isom and Albert Arnold Orndoff, Appellants, 432 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir. 1970)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 432 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir. 1970) November 9, 1970

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; M. D. Crocker, Judge.

Donald H. Hazel, Sanger, Cal. (argued) on § 25581, Eugene W. Krum, Sanger, Cal. (argued) on § 25582, for appellant.

Richard V. Boulger, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Dwayne Keyes, U. S. Atty., Fresno, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, DUNIWAY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


The judgment of conviction is reversed for the reason that there was not enough evidence of dominion and control by the defendants to sustain the conviction.

Cf. Williams v. United States, 9 Cir., 418 F.2d 159.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.