United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Philip Dale Supina, Defendant-appellant, 428 F.2d 1226 (9th Cir. 1970)
Annotate this CaseW. Edward Morgan, (argued) Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant.
Joe Jencks, (argued) Asst. U. S. Atty., Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Jo Ann D. Diamos, Asst. U. S. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction against Philip Dale Supina for refusing to submit to induction (50 U.S.C.App. § 462) is reversed.
The record discloses that this is another one of those cases in which the registrant was processed for induction as a "delinquent" by his Local Board after he failed to report for his physical examination. United States v. Stow, 427 F.2d 891 (9th Cir. filed May 27, 1970); see United States v. Broyles, 427 F.2d 358 (9th Cir. filed June 8, 1970); United States v. Thomas, 422 F.2d 1327 (9th Cir. 1970).
Honorable Philip C. Wilkins, United States District Judge, Sacramento, California, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
