United States of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Antonio Amador Berumen, Appellant, 426 F.2d 310 (9th Cir. 1970)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; John F. Kilkenny, Judge.
Robert L. Pippin, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.
Harry D. Stewart, U. S. Atty., Joseph A. Milchen, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
We find no error in the court's ruling on the motion to suppress. The jury instructions given in the trial court were not objected to by defendant's counsel. We find no plain error in the instructions. Perhaps defendant might have had some supplemental instructions had he requested them, but he did not.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
