S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. and the Sterling Company, Appellants, v. the Renegotiation Board, Appellee, 426 F.2d 290 (2d Cir. 1970)
Annotate this CaseDecided May 5, 1970
Charles H. Tuttle, New York City (Breed, Abbott & Morgan, Edward J. Ross and Miriam C. Feigelson, New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
Ronald R. Glancz, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Alan S. Rosenthal, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.
Before MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and WEINFELD,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Tax Court, holding (1) the provisions of the Renegotiation Act of 1951, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. § 1211 et seq.) to be applicable to excessive profits realized under a Capehart Act housing contract (42 U.S.C §§ 1594-1594k; 12 U.S.C. §§ 1748-1748h-3) and (2) such application to be constitutional, is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Mulroney, reported at 51 T.C. No. 89 (March 4, 1969).
Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
