Alicia Ruth, Inc., Petitioner-appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee, 421 F.2d 1393 (5th Cir. 1970)
Annotate this CaseStanley P. Kaplan, Miami, Fla., for petitioner-appellant.
Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Issie L. Jenkins, Benjamin M. Parker, Harry D. Shapiro, John P. Burke, Attys., Tax Div., U. S. Dept. of Justice, K. Martin Worthy, Chief Counsel, Christopher J. Ray, Atty., I.R.S., Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and COLEMAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The corporate taxpayer appeals from a decision of the Tax Court (memoranda opinion 28 T.C. M 262) disallowing as a deduction the amounts paid as alleged compensation to a fifty percent stockholder. As all of the witnesses were interested financially in the outcome of the case and there were many circumstances, doubts and uncertainties about the arrangement under which the stockholder claimed he was serving the corporation by steering customers into this Miami Beach ladies shop, the trier of fact was entitled to conclude that the amount disbursed was not compensation. Consequently, disallowing it altogether was not error. Thus no employment relationship was established.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
