Madeleine C. Hackman, Petitioner-appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee.madeleine C. Hackman et al., Petitioners-appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee, 418 F.2d 920 (6th Cir. 1969)
Annotate this CaseMadeleine C. Hackman, in pro per.
Michael H. Singer, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Bennett N. Hollander, Daniel B. Rosenbaum, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on brief, for appellee.
Before WEICK, CELEBREZZE and McCREE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the briefs, oral argument and record, the Court is of the opinion that the petitioners did not sustain the burden of proof upon them to establish their claim that the determinations of deficiencies against them by the Respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue, were erroneous.
It is therefore ordered that the decisions of the Tax Court of the United States be and they are hereby affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
