Mauk Seattle Lumber Co., Appellant, v. Alcan Pacific Co., Appellee.alcan Pacific Co., Appellant, v. Mauk Seattle Lumber Co., Appellee, 414 F.2d 832 (9th Cir. 1969)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska; Raymond E. Plummer, Judge.
John Kovarik (argued), of Casey & Pruzan, Seattle, Wash., Collins & Clasby, Fairbanks, Alaska, for appellant.
Charles E. Cole (argued), Fairbanks, Alaska, for appellee.
Before JERTBERG and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and FOLEY, District Judge* .
PER CURIAM:
On July 22, 1966, Judge Raymond E. Plummer, of the District of Alaska, filed his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Alcan Pacific Co., Plaintiff, vs. Mauk Seattle Lumber Co., Defendants. On November 22, 1966, the District Judge filed his Order Supplementing Findings of Fact and his Judgment.
Reviewing the entire record on appeal, we are satisfied that the Findings of the trial court are substantially supported by the evidence and are not "clearly erroneous".
On the basis of the Findings of Fact, Supplemental Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the District Judge, 302 F. Supp. 606, the judgment is affirmed.
Honorable Roger D. Foley, District of Nevada, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
