National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Vangas, Inc., Respondent, 413 F.2d 547 (9th Cir. 1969)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 413 F.2d 547 (9th Cir. 1969) August 11, 1969

Glen M. Bendixsen (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., Washington, D. C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

Blaine Pettitt (argued), of Pettitt, Blumberg & Sherr, Fresno, Cal., Le Prohn & Le Prohn, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.

Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:


We find that the discharge of Allen Robins cannot be said to show any anti-union bias and cannot be said to be anything but the exercise of sound business judgment in a critical situation. Therefore, the proposed order will not be enforced.

Judge MERRILL would enforce.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.