Walter Lee Ervin, Appellant, v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden, Appellee, 411 F.2d 990 (9th Cir. 1969)
Annotate this CaseEvelyn N. Scott (argued), Salem, Or., for appellant.
David H. Blunt (argued), Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert Y. Thornton, Atty. Gen., Salem, Or., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and BEEKS, District Judge.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
PER CURIAM:
The appeal is dismissed.
This case began with a state conviction. It was affirmed on appeal. State v. Ervin, 241 Or. 475, 406 P.2d 901 (1965).
Next Ervin files in federal district court asserting many points never submitted at any time.
Oregon has post-conviction remedies, but no attempt has been made to use them.
Duty requires us to interfere with state process from time to time, but in this case obviously not yet.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
