Edward Serzysko, Plaintiff-appellant-appellee, v. the Chase Manhattan Bank, Defendant-respondent-appellant, 409 F.2d 1360 (2d Cir. 1969)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - 409 F.2d 1360 (2d Cir. 1969) Argued April 22, 1969
Decided May 20, 1969

Appeal, and cross-appeal, from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, Graven, J., dismissing plaintiff's complaint for damages sustained by reason of defendant having made loans to plaintiff in violation of Federal Reserve Board Regulation U, and dismissing defendant's counterclaim for the unpaid balance of the indebtedness incurred by plaintiff on the loans.

Arthur C. Fink, New York City (Fink, Weinberger & Levin, New York City, and Walter Talmont, Hempstead, N. Y., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant-appellee.

A. Donald MacKinnon, New York City (Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy and Adlai S. Hardin, Jr., New York City, on the brief), for defendant-respondent-appellant.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and WYATT, District Judge.* 

PER CURIAM:


We affirm in all respects the judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York for the reasons stated in the thorough and well reasoned opinion of Judge Graven reported at 290 F. Supp. 74 (S.D.N.Y. 1968).

 *

Sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.