Clyde Bates and Manuel Chavez, Appellants, v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden of San Quentin Prison, Appellee, 406 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1969)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 406 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1969) January 14, 1969

Ruth Jacobs, San Francisco, Cal., for Bates.

Norman Leonard, of Gladstein, Andersen, Leonard & Sibbett, San Francisco, Cal., for Chavez.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of Cal., Albert W. Harris, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles R. B. Kirk, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before BROWNING and ELY, Circuit Judges, and BELLONI, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:


On November 20, 1967, we issued an opinion in which the District Court's denial of the appellants' petitions for habeas corpus was affirmed. 385 F.2d 771 (9th Cir. 1967). Thereafter, the Supreme Court announced its decisions in Burgett v. Texas, 389 U.S. 109, 88 S. Ct. 258, 19 L. Ed. 2d 319 (1967), Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S. Ct. 1620, 20 L. Ed. 2d 476 (1968), and Roberts v. Russell, 392 U.S. 293, 88 S. Ct. 1921, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1100 (1968). The Supreme Court has now vacated our decision of November 20, 1967, and directed us to reconsider the petitioners' appeal in the light of its above cited decisions. Bates v. Nelson, 393 U.S. 16, 89 S. Ct. 50, 21 L. Ed. 2d 21 (Oct. 14, 1968). We think it appropriate that the District Court should have the first opportunity to reconsider the problems in the light of newly announced principles which now apply.

The District Court's order denying the appellants' petitions for habeas corpus will be vacated, and the District Court will conduct such further proceedings as are required by the Supreme Court's directive.

Reversed and remanded.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.