National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Cleveland Stereotypers' Union No. 22, Internationalstereotypers' and Electrotypers' Union of Northamerica, Afl-cio, Respondent, 402 F.2d 270 (6th Cir. 1968)
Annotate this CaseHerman M. Levy, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Edward E. Wall, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner.
Corrigan & Garver, John H. Garver, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief for respondent.
Before O'SULLIVAN and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This case is before the Court upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the respondent labor union. The decision and order of the Board is reported at 160 N.L.R.B. 1184. The Board's earlier decision and determination of dispute made pursuant to Section 10(k) of the Act is reported at 156 N.L.R.B. 1219.
Upon consideration the Court concludes that the determination of the Board represents a balanced consideration of all factors presented in the record and is neither arbitrary nor capricious. We find that it is a reasonable decision supported by substantial evidence.
It is ordered that the order of the Board be and hereby is enforced.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
