United States of America, Appellee, v. Anthony Fernandez, Appellant, 401 F.2d 183 (9th Cir. 1968)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Southern Division; William T. Beeks, Judge.
Anthony Fernandez, Pro se, for appellant.
Eugene G. Cushing, U. S. Atty., John S. Obenour, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tacoma, Wash., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Fernandez appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. This is Fernandez' fourth motion for a new trial, his three previous motions, and a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, having been denied. He was convicted in December, 1962 on several counts of two indictments charging interstate frauds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314 (1964), and conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1964). Our decision affirming the conviction became final on April 29, 1964. Fernandez v. United States, 9 Cir., 329 F.2d 899.
Our examination of the record convinces us that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
