J. Howard Arnold, Appellant, v. William J. Mcguiness, Appellee, 400 F.2d 392 (9th Cir. 1968)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 400 F.2d 392 (9th Cir. 1968) August 5, 1968
Rehearing Denied September 23, 1968

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division; Oliver J. Carter, Judge.

J. Howard Arnold (argued), Berkeley, Cal., for appellant.

Thomas J. Fennone (argued), Deputy County Counsel, Richard J. Moore, County Counsel, Oakland, Cal., for appellee.

Before JERTBERG and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and FOLEY, District Judge* .

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered appellant's assignments of error and they have no merit. We agree with and adopt the decision of the district court.1  We also reaffirm this Court's prior decisions, wherein J. Howard Arnold was twice before this Court as the appellant.2 

Affirmed.

 *

Roger D. Foley, District of Nevada, sitting by designation

 1

See Memorandum and Order filed February 2, 1967, Arnold v. McGuiness, U.S. D.C. N.D.Calif., 289 F. Supp. 210

 2

See Arnold v. Bostick, 9 Cir., 1964, 339 F.2d 879, cert. den. 382 U.S. 858, 86 S. Ct. 113, 15 L. Ed. 2d 96; unreported Order in Arnold v. McGuiness, 9 Cir., 1966, No. 20617, cert. den. 386 U.S. 996, 87 S. Ct. 1315, 18 L. Ed. 2d 343

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.