Thomas Daniel Engel, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 395 F.2d 207 (5th Cir. 1968)
Annotate this CaseSam E. Murrell, Jr., Orlando, Fla., for appellant.
Thomas M. Baumer, Allan P. Clark, Asst. U. S. Attys., Edward F. Boardman, U. S. Atty., Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellee.
Before POPE,* TUTTLE and CLAYTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant's contention that the order of induction by his draft board had been revoked is not supported by the record. We conclude that no error was committed by the trial court as to the other matters raised on appeal.
Appellant's request that he now be permitted to be inducted and serve should properly be addressed to the trial court upon the filing of a motion for reduction of sentence under Rule 35 F.R.Cr.P.
Affirmed.
Of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
